Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.38 seconds)

Ashok Kumar Goel vs Public Information Officer Vat Ward No ... on 7 March, 2012

(Copy of GEM Bid is enclosed at Annexure - B, Page No. 9 -14). Here, the question arises how the Purchase / Tender Committee selected M/s GGR Enterprise when the Firm is Technically not qualified for the Work. Further, the rates of the Commodities are going on increasing and in July 2023, the Karnataka government allowed the Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) to increase the price of Nandini milk by ₹3 per Liter and again in Jul 2024 ₹2 was hiked now the question arises will the Vendor will quote the same price even after the increase rates in commodities. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Ashok Kumar Goel Vs Public Information Officer, VAT, LPA 190/2012 in Para 8 as observed :-
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 11 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Shri Chander Sekhar on 23 March, 2012

The Delhi High Court's decision in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs Shri Chander Sekhar (LPA No. 900/2010), was also of the view that the bidders in the technical part may reveal to the tender calling institution their technology and processes evolved and developed by them and which technology and processes may not otherwise be in public domain and which the bidder may not want revealed to the competitors and which technology/processes the bidder may be using works for the other clients also and which technology/processes if revealed to the competitors may lead to the bidder losing the competitive edge in subsequent awards of contracts. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced as under:
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 22 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Mrdebajit Dutta vs Oil India Limited (Oil) on 8 August, 2016

(b) The Central Information Commission in the case titled Mr debajit Dutta Vs Oil India Limited (Oil) (Annexure R9) has stated that ".... We agree with the First Appellate Authority that disclosure of the information sought by the Complainant, even though after completion of the tender process, could have an impact on future similar tenders to be floated by them, in terms of the offers that are made by interested parties. This is inadequate ground for them to claim exemption under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, particularly since they are a commercial entity...."
Central Information Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next