Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.38 seconds)The Official Secrets Act, 1923
The Freedom Of Information Act, 2002
Section 11 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Ashok Kumar Goel vs Public Information Officer Vat Ward No ... on 7 March, 2012
(Copy of GEM
Bid is enclosed at Annexure - B, Page No. 9 -14). Here, the question arises how the
Purchase / Tender Committee selected M/s GGR Enterprise when the Firm is
Technically not qualified for the Work. Further, the rates of the Commodities are
going on increasing and in July 2023, the Karnataka government allowed the
Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF) to increase the price of Nandini milk by ₹3 per Liter
and again in Jul 2024 ₹2 was hiked now the question arises will the Vendor will quote
the same price even after the increase rates in commodities. Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi in Ashok Kumar Goel Vs Public Information Officer, VAT, LPA 190/2012 in Para 8
as observed :-
State Of Jharkhand & Anr vs Navin Kumar Singh & Anr on 14 February, 2014
Jharkhand High Court in the matter of State of Jharkhand And Anr. vs Navin
Kumar Singha And Anr. on 8 August, 2007 where the aspect of Sec 8(1)(d) was
discussed in detail. The operative part of the decision is extracted below :
Mrajay Chadha vs Ndmc, Gnct Delhi on 1 September, 2014
Hon'ble Central Information Commission in Mr. Ajay Chadha vs Ndmc, Gnct Delhi,
CIC/DS/A/2013/001664 as observed :-
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs Shri Chander Sekhar on 23 March, 2012
The Delhi High Court's decision in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs Shri Chander
Sekhar (LPA No. 900/2010), was also of the view that the bidders in the technical
part may reveal to the tender calling institution their technology and processes
evolved and developed by them and which technology and processes may not
otherwise be in public domain and which the bidder may not want revealed to the
competitors and which technology/processes the bidder may be using works for
the other clients also and which technology/processes if revealed to the
competitors may lead to the bidder losing the competitive edge in subsequent
awards of contracts. The relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced as under:
Mrdebajit Dutta vs Oil India Limited (Oil) on 8 August, 2016
(b) The Central Information Commission in the case titled Mr debajit Dutta
Vs Oil India Limited (Oil) (Annexure R9) has stated that ".... We agree with
the First Appellate Authority that disclosure of the information sought by
the Complainant, even though after completion of the tender process,
could have an impact on future similar tenders to be floated by them, in
terms of the offers that are made by interested parties. This is inadequate
ground for them to claim exemption under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act,
particularly since they are a commercial entity...."