Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Sukhdev Singh Sidhu vs M/S Emerging India Housing Corporation on 25 January, 2017
Vijay Kumar Ghai vs Pritpal Singh Babbar on 4 July, 2022
Vijay Kumar Ghai Vs. Pritpal Singh Babbar, CRM-M-22685-2021 (O&M) decided on 04.07.2022.
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shamsher Singh Dinarpur vs Emerging India Housing Corporation ... on 1 June, 2021
Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka vs Tourism Finance Corporation Of India ... on 15 March, 2023
Thus, under Section 79 (15) (b) it is clearly defined that "excluded debt" means the liability to pay damages for negligence, nuisance or breach of a statutory, contractual or other legal obligation. In the present case, in all the consumer complaints, the complainants/buyers booked their respective dwelling units under different schemes in the company named Emerging India/Emerging Valley of which the applicant, is admittedly the Managing Director. Neither possession of the dwelling units was delivered to them nor the amount paid by them towards their respective dwelling units was refunded. Ultimately, they filed consumer complaints before this Commission and those have been allowed and damages in the shape of compensation have been awarded. Thus, the decreetal amount in each complaint has become "excluded debt" under Section 79 (15) (b) of the Code. Consequently, the provisions of Section 94 of the Code are not applicable to the cases, out of which these applications have arisen.
Besides, as above, Emerging India Housing Corporation Private Limited is not a corporate debtor before the NCLT. Even M/s Emerin which is a corporate debtor before the NCLT is not a party in any of the consumer complaints pending before this Commission.
Now, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the latest judgment in case_ Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka Vs. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd., [Criminal Appeals No. 170-171-172 of 2023] [Criminal Appeal No. 171/2023] decided on 15.03.2023 has held that the directors of a Company are liable under the criminal proceedings and thus, the proceedings cannot be stayed against them. Relevant part of the said order is reproduced hereunder:-