Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)
Zahid Ali Khan vs Secretary State Of M.P. And 4 Ors. on 12 December, 2017 cites

Mujahid Ali Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 December, 2016

29. The vires of the recruitment rules is challenged only on the ground that 100% reservation in favour of female is against the mandate of Article 14,15,16 of the Constitution of India, but now the same has been withdrawn by the State Government vide notification dated 27/06/2015, therefore, we are of the opinion that now in the changed circumstance, there is no need to consider vires of the amended rules. The State Government is ready to issue fresh advertisement for the posts of "Staff Nurse" according to the amended rules inviting application from both male and female aspirants and notification 10 W.P. No.6856/2013 Zahid Ali Khan vs. State of M.P. dated 26/07/2011 (Annexure-P/2) is already withdrawn; therefore, there is no need to issue any writ, direction or order directing the respondents to issue advertisement in accordance with law, permitting male nurses to apply for the posts of "Staff Nurse".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Mohammed Aijaz vs Principal Secretary State Of M.P. And 5 ... on 21 January, 2016

23. In rejoinder, the petitioner has denied all the submissions of the respondents and reiterated the facts and arguments raised in the petition. It is submitted that controversy that the Recruitment Rules, 1989 apply to male or female has already been decided and the same is confirmed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Sajid Khan in SLP No.27731/2012 decided on 24/09/2012 (Annexure-P/13).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 3005 - P K Jaiswal - Full Document

Arun Tewari & Ors vs Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh & Ors. Etc on 1 December, 1997

30. As far as issue of prescribing compulsory qualification of 10+2 with Physics, Chemistry and Biology is concerned, that is prescribed for all aspirants and no discrimination amongst the candidates is being done on this ground. The law in this regard is well settled. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held in Arun Tewari and others Vs. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh and others etc. AIR 1998 SC 331 that "A higher qualification which is prescribed for a particular scheme cannot be considered as violative of Article
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 183 - S V Manohar - Full Document
1