Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.28 seconds)

Reddi Rami Reddi vs Public Prosecutor Of Kurnool on 16 September, 1914

3. The question has arisen before and been answered in different ways. It arose in Rami Reddi v. The Public Prosecutor of Kurnoop (1914) 27 M.L.J. 586 and the answer was apparently that each of the Courts should sanction, which negatives part of Dr. John's contention. The statements in question were made one before a Sub-Magistrate under Section 164, Criminal Procedure Code, and the other in the Sessions Court.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1