Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.18 seconds)Girdhari Lal Son Of Shri Sher Singh vs Shashi Kumari Wife Of Shri Girdhari Lal ... on 5 December, 2016
The respondent being government
employee admittedly in Irrigation Department of
Punjab has been drawing his salary more than
4 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2023 05:03:19 :::
CRR(F)-207 of 2022
Rs.60,000/- to 70,000/- per month but has
concealed the same deliberately on record
otherwise must have brought his salary record on
the record for showing his bona-fide and resulting
of which, it concluded from the rival circumstances
of the parties that the applicant no.1 is entitled to
enhanced amount of maintenance more than of
Rs.10,000/- per month but has claimed enhanced
amount of maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month
only from the date of filing this application filed on
24.02.2014 till entitlement of the same by the
applicants from the respondent as per view taken
in Girdhar Lal Vs. Shashi Kumari, 2017(2) CCC-
745(HP), Rajnesh Vs. Neha and anr 2021-SCC-
324, Seema and another Vs.Gourav Juneja with
Gourav Juneja Vs. Seema and another
2019(2)RCR(Crl)219,Madhu and another Vs.
Rajesh Gupta 2019(4) RCR(Crl.
Reema Salkan vs Sumer Singh Salkan on 25 September, 2018
)737, Smt.
Chitrawati and others Vs. Azad Singh 2003 (2)
SimLJ 1719 and Reema Salkan Vs. Sumer Singh
Salkan 2018(4) RCR (Crl.)395, referred by learned
counsel for the applicants for altering the
maintenance toward higher side in favour of the
applicant no.1 and resulting of which, the said
issues are decided partly to the said effect in
favour of the applicant no.1 and resultantly
5 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2023 05:03:19 :::
against the respondent.
Section 9 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 13B in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Gourav Juneja vs Seema And Anr on 3 October, 2018
The respondent being government
employee admittedly in Irrigation Department of
Punjab has been drawing his salary more than
4 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 25-01-2023 05:03:19 :::
CRR(F)-207 of 2022
Rs.60,000/- to 70,000/- per month but has
concealed the same deliberately on record
otherwise must have brought his salary record on
the record for showing his bona-fide and resulting
of which, it concluded from the rival circumstances
of the parties that the applicant no.1 is entitled to
enhanced amount of maintenance more than of
Rs.10,000/- per month but has claimed enhanced
amount of maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month
only from the date of filing this application filed on
24.02.2014 till entitlement of the same by the
applicants from the respondent as per view taken
in Girdhar Lal Vs. Shashi Kumari, 2017(2) CCC-
745(HP), Rajnesh Vs. Neha and anr 2021-SCC-
324, Seema and another Vs.Gourav Juneja with
Gourav Juneja Vs. Seema and another
2019(2)RCR(Crl)219,Madhu and another Vs.
Rajesh Gupta 2019(4) RCR(Crl.
1