Ishwar Singh Bindra & Ors vs The State Of U.P on 2 May, 1968
25. The Apex Court in Ishwar Singh Bindra and
others vs. The State of U.P., AIR 1968 SC 1450, has held as
under:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)M. Satyanarayana vs The State Of Karnataka & Anr on 12 March, 1986
23. The Apex Court in M. Satyanarayana vs. State of
Karnataka and another, (1986) 2 SCC 512 (Two Judges) has
held as under:-
A.K. Gopalan vs The State Of Madras.Union Of India: ... on 19 May, 1950
In this connection reference may
be made to A.K. Gopalan v. The State of Madras, AIR
1950 SC 27.
R. S. Nayak vs A. R. Antulay on 16 February, 1984
24. The Apex Court in R.S. Nayak vs. A.R. Antulay,
(1984) 2 SCC 183 (Five Judges), has held as under:-
Babu Manmohan Das Shah & Ors vs Bishun Das on 12 October, 1966
"45. ... ... ...The use of the expression 'or' does
appear to us to be a disjunctive as contended on
behalf of the respondent. Depending upon the
context,'or' may be read 'and' but the court would
not do it unless it is so obliged because 'or' does not
generally mean 'and' and 'and' does not generally
mean 'or'. (See Green v. Premier Glyrhonwy State
Company Ltd.', (1928) 1 KB 561; Babu Manmohan
Das & Ors. v. Bishun Das, AIR 1967 SC 643; Kamta
Prasad Aggarwal etc. v. Executive Engineer,
Balladgarh & Anr., (1974) 4 SCC 440 and several
other which we consider it unnecessary to
enumerate here)".
R. Prabha Devi & Ors vs Government Of India, Through ... on 8 March, 1988
In R. Prabha Devi and others Vs. Government of
India through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel and Training,
Administrative Reforms and others, (1988) 2 SCC 233,
Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that seniority in a
particular cadre does not entitle a public servant for
promotion to a higher post unless he fulfills the eligibility
::: Downloaded on - 21/07/2018 23:01:46 :::HCHP
...16...
Shiba Shankar Mohapatra & Ors vs State Of Orissa & Ors on 12 November, 2009
In Shiba Shankar Mohapatra and others Vs.
State of Orissa and others, (2010) 12 SCC 471, Hon'ble
Supreme Court has held that one must not loose sight that
seniority and eligibility for promotion are two different
concepts altogether.
Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Ltd on 13 March, 2008
22. The Apex Court in Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam
Ltd. vs. Essar Power Ltd., (2008) 4 SCC 755 (Two Judges),
has held as under:-
Palure Bhaskar Rao Etc.Etc vs P.Ramaseshaiah & Ors. Etc on 12 April, 2017
In Palure Bhaskar Rao and others Vs. P.
Ramaseshaiah and others, (2017) 5 SCC 783, Hon'ble
Supreme Court has held as under that seniority and
eligibility are also distinct concepts.
Green Valley Plywood Ltd vs National Insurance Co.Ltd on 13 April, 2015
"45. ... ... ...The use of the expression 'or' does
appear to us to be a disjunctive as contended on
behalf of the respondent. Depending upon the
context,'or' may be read 'and' but the court would
not do it unless it is so obliged because 'or' does not
generally mean 'and' and 'and' does not generally
mean 'or'. (See Green v. Premier Glyrhonwy State
Company Ltd.', (1928) 1 KB 561; Babu Manmohan
Das & Ors. v. Bishun Das, AIR 1967 SC 643; Kamta
Prasad Aggarwal etc. v. Executive Engineer,
Balladgarh & Anr., (1974) 4 SCC 440 and several
other which we consider it unnecessary to
enumerate here)".