Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.31 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 14 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Ntpc Limited vs Talaipalli Coal Mining Pvt. Ltd. & Anr on 6 October, 2021
29. It is also relevant to note that NTPC had preferred a petition under
Section 14 of the A&C Act being OMP(T)(COMM) 101/2021
captioned "NTPC Limited v. Talaipalli Coal Mining Pvt. Ltd and
Anr.". The said petition was disposed of by an order dated 11.10.2021
passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. The relevant extract of the
said order is reproduced below:
Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
Section 11 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd vs M/S Aksh Optifibre Ltd., & Anr on 12 August, 2005
35. The Supreme Court in the case of Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd.
v. Aksh Optifibre Ltd.: (2005) 7 SCC 234 dealt with the question
concerning the standards of examination at the stage of referring the
parties to arbitration albeit, in the context of Section 45 of the A&C Act.
The relevant extract from the opinion of B.N. Srikrishna, J. is set out
below:
Vidya Drolia vs Durga Trading Corporation on 14 December, 2020
36. The aforesaid view was also approved by the Supreme Court in
the later decision in Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation: