Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.56 seconds)
Mrs Jayanti Ahuja vs M/O Information And Broadcasting on 1 April, 2022 cites

Shri Jai Karan Singh Chauhan Bal Kishan ... vs Delhi Develpment Authority & Ors Union ... on 14 February, 2019

The said order of this Tribunal dated 02.03.2007 was challenged by the applicants before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench by way of filing DBCWP No. 1235/2008 (Jai Prakash Sharma vs. UOI & Ors.), DBCWP No. 1236/2008 (Rupendra Kumar Saxena vs. UOI & Ors.) and DBCWP No. 10018/2008 (Mrs. Jayanti Ahuja vs. UOI & Ors.) and the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan vide its order dated 03.03.2014 disposed of the said Writ Petitions on the ground that subsequent developments have taken place in 2012 for consideration of candidatures of persons for regularization, gave a fresh cause of action to the applicants and as these developments were not before the Tribunal while deciding the OAs, therefore, applicants vide order dated 03.03.2014 were given liberty to file fresh OAs before this Tribunal and the same to be decided on merits in accordance with law. Thus, being aggrieved by the action of the respondents, applicants have approached this Tribunal for regularization of their services on the post of LDC from the dates persons junior to the applicants have been regularized.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 223 - C H Shankar - Full Document

Rajendra Saxena vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 9 July, 2021

The said order of this Tribunal dated 02.03.2007 was challenged by the applicants before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench by way of filing DBCWP No. 1235/2008 (Jai Prakash Sharma vs. UOI & Ors.), DBCWP No. 1236/2008 (Rupendra Kumar Saxena vs. UOI & Ors.) and DBCWP No. 10018/2008 (Mrs. Jayanti Ahuja vs. UOI & Ors.) and the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan vide its order dated 03.03.2014 disposed of the said Writ Petitions on the ground that subsequent developments have taken place in 2012 for consideration of candidatures of persons for regularization, gave a fresh cause of action to the applicants and as these developments were not before the Tribunal while deciding the OAs, therefore, applicants vide order dated 03.03.2014 were given liberty to file fresh OAs before this Tribunal and the same to be decided on merits in accordance with law. Thus, being aggrieved by the action of the respondents, applicants have approached this Tribunal for regularization of their services on the post of LDC from the dates persons junior to the applicants have been regularized.
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - N K Gupta - Full Document

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

The said OAs were dismissed by a common order dated 02.03.2007 relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court passed in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Umadevi & Ors., reported in 2006 (4) SCC 1. The respondents have regularized services of juniors from the same list on the post of LDC on the basis of regularization scheme dated 09.06.1992 and 17.03.1994 and in compliance of order dated 02.11.2005 (Annexure A/15). Also by order dated 16.07.2008 (Annexure A/20), respondent 5 OA No. 281/2014 no. 2 regularized services of 8 casual General Assistants on the post of LDC, 3 of whom were junior to the applicants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 4959 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

Mrs. Damyanti Keshri vs The State Of Chhattisgarh 44 ... on 7 January, 2019

The said order of this Tribunal dated 02.03.2007 was challenged by the applicants before the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench by way of filing DBCWP No. 1235/2008 (Jai Prakash Sharma vs. UOI & Ors.), DBCWP No. 1236/2008 (Rupendra Kumar Saxena vs. UOI & Ors.) and DBCWP No. 10018/2008 (Mrs. Jayanti Ahuja vs. UOI & Ors.) and the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan vide its order dated 03.03.2014 disposed of the said Writ Petitions on the ground that subsequent developments have taken place in 2012 for consideration of candidatures of persons for regularization, gave a fresh cause of action to the applicants and as these developments were not before the Tribunal while deciding the OAs, therefore, applicants vide order dated 03.03.2014 were given liberty to file fresh OAs before this Tribunal and the same to be decided on merits in accordance with law. Thus, being aggrieved by the action of the respondents, applicants have approached this Tribunal for regularization of their services on the post of LDC from the dates persons junior to the applicants have been regularized.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - P S Koshy - Full Document
1