Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)Section 24 in The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act, 1956
Vinod Dulerai Mehta vs Kanak Vinod Mehta on 27 April, 1989
In this context I may usefully refer to a Division Bench decision of the Bombay High Court rendered in the case of Vinod Dulerai Mehta v. Kanak Vinod Mehta, AIR 1990 Bombay 120, wherein P.B. Sawant, J. (as his Lordship then was) speaking for the Court held as under :
Gita Chatterjee vs Probhat Kumar Chatterjee on 30 April, 1987
6. Resisting the aforesaid submissions, it is proponed by Mr. A.K. Jain, learned Counsel for the non-applicant that the learned trial Judge has considered the documents filed before him and has rightly arrived at the figure and, therefore, no fault can be found with the order passed by him. It is his further submission that the petitioner should have honestly disclosed his income and as he has suppressed the same the learned trial Judge has rightly determined the income and has fixed the quantum of monthly maintenance allowance. Mr. Jain in support of his submission has placed reliance on the decisions rendered in the cases of Gita Chatterjee v. Probhat Kumar Chatterjee, AIR 1988 Calcutta 83; Pradeep Kumar Kapoor v. Ms. Shailja Kapoor, AIR 1989 Delhi 10; Dev Dutt Singh v. Sml, Rajni Gandhi, AIR 1984 Delhi 320; Sharad Kumar Gotee v. Mangla Goto, 1987 (1) MPWN 220; and Jasbir Kaur Sehgal (Smt) v. District Judge, Dehradun and Ors., (1997) 7 SCC 7=II (1997) DMC 338 (SC)=II (1997) CLT 398 (SC).
Section 13 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Pradeep Kumar Kapoor vs Sbailja Kapoor on 20 May, 1988
In the case of Pradeep Kumar Kapoor (supra), certain principles have been laid down indicating the basis on which an application under Section 24 of the Act should be decided. It reads as under :
Smt. Jasbir Kaur Sehgal vs The District Judge Dehradun & Ors on 27 August, 1997
9. At this juncture, I may hasten to add that in the case of Jasbir Kaur Sehgal (supra), the Apex Court has also dealt with the discretion of the Court while granting maintenance from a particular date. It reads as under :
1