Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.20 seconds)
State vs . Kanta Devi on 31 August, 2022 cites

Sadhu Singh(D) By Lrs. Etc. Etc. vs The State Of Punjab on 31 March, 2022

19. In the present case, as per PW3 ASI Sukhbinder Singh, public persons were requested to join the investigation. However, it is clear that no efforts were made to join the independent witnesses despite their availability which causes a serious dent in the story of the prosecution. Reliance in this regard is placed upon Anoop Joshi Vs. State 1992 (2) C.C. Cases 314 (HC), Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana 199 (1) C.L.R. 69 and Sadhu Singh Vs. State of Punjab 1997 (3) Crime 55.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

M/S. A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mill Ltd. .. ... vs State Of Kerala & Ors. .. Respondents on 14 December, 2006

"The prosecution has not offered any explanation whatsoever as to under what circumstances number of the FIR Ex.PW2/A had appeared on the top of the said documents, which were allegedly on the spot before its registration. This give rise to two inferences that either the FIR (Ex.PW2/a) was recorded prior to the alleged recovery of the contraband or number of the said FIR was inserted in these documents after its registration. In both the situation, it seriously reflects upon the veracity of the prosecution version and creates a good deal of doubt about recovery of the contraband in the manner alleged by the prosecution. That being so, the benefit arising out of such a situation must necessarily go to the appellant". The same view was adopted in the case of Mohd. Hashim. Appellant Vs. State 2000 CRI.L.J. 15010 Pawan Kumar Vs. Delhi Administration, 1987 CCC 585 and Mewa Ram Vs. State 200 CRI.L.J.114.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 229 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next