Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 22 in The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The University Grants Commission Act, 1956
The Right to Information Act, 2005
Kurmanchal Inst. Of Degree & Diploma & ... vs Chancellor, M.J.P. Rohilkhand Univ. & ... on 17 May, 2007
In a subsequent decision in Kurmanchal Institute of Degree & Diploma (supra), the Supreme Court held, while construing the provisions of the UGC Act and the Uttar Pradesh Universities Act 1973, that each University in the country, though recognized by UGC, must have its own territorial jurisdiction, save and except for Central Universities or those specified in legislative enactments. In that context, the Supreme Court observed as follows:
S. Azeez Basha And Anr vs Union Of India on 20 October, 1967
"Mere conferment of degree is not enough. What is necessary is that the degree should be recognized. It is for this purpose that the right to confer degree has been given under Section 22 of the UGC Act only to a University established or incorporated by or under a Central Act, Provincial Act or State Act or an institution deemed to be a University under Section 3 or an institution specially empowered by an Act of Parliament to confer or grant degrees. Sub-section (3) of this section provides that "degree" means any such degree as may, with the previous approval of the Central Government, be specified in this behalf by the Commission by notification in the Official Gazette. The value and importance of such degrees which are recognized by the Government was pointed out by a Constitution Bench in S. Azeez Basha v. Union of India7."
Raj Kishore Singh vs State Of U P Thr.Prin.Secy.Home Civil ... on 11 January, 2010
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AFR
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 60876 of 2013
Petitioners:- Akhtar Ali Ansari & Anr
Respondents:- State of U P & 3 Ors
Counsel for Petitioners:- Rahul Agarwal
Counsel for Respondents:- C B Yadav, Additional Advocate General, Shashank Shekhar Singh, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, H P Mishra, Rizwan Ali Akhtar, V P Mathur, V P Varshney
Hon'ble Dr Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J
(Per Dr D Y Chandrachud, CJ)
While dealing with a writ petition filed by two Junior Engineers in the Rural Engineering Department at Aligarh, a Division Bench of this Court, finding itself not to be in agreement with an earlier decision rendered on 10 May 2013 in Raj Kishore Pandey & Anr Vs State of U P1, referred the following questions for resolution by the Full Bench:
1