Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.46 seconds)Section 4 in Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 [Entire Act]
Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978
Chhedi Lal Yadav vs Hari Kishore Yadav (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. on 19 April, 2017
9. The principles laid down by the Apex Court in
Chhedi Lal Yadav .vs. Hari Kishore Yadav 5 [(2018)
5
(2018) 12 SCC 527
Sri.Ningappa Hanamappa Hebsur vs The Deputy Commissioner on 28 July, 2020
While recording the
finding, this Court relied on the judgment of the Apex
Court in Ningappa .vs. Deputy Commissioner and
others, where the Apex Court had declined to entertain
the application which was submitted after nine years
seeking restoration of land under Sections 4 and 5 of the
PTCL Act. The judgment rendered by a co-ordinate Bench
of this Court in W.P.No.50446/2012 is affirmed by the
Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.16/2021.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Sri K Rajendran vs The Deputy Commissioner on 28 March, 2018
11. The judgment cited by the learned counsel for
the petitioners in the case of K.Rajendran vs. The
Deputy Commissioner in W.P.No.12242/2018 is not
at all applicable to the present case on hand. In the said
case, though the sale deed was executed on 14.10.1976
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi vs State Of Karnataka on 26 October, 2017
2. Before I advert to the facts of the present case,
it would be useful to refer to the judgments rendered by
the Apex Court on this issue in Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi
.vs. State of Karnataka and another 1 and Vivek M.
Hinduja .vs. M. Aswatha2. It would be also useful to
refer to the judgment rendered by a Co-Ordinate Bench of
this Court in W.P.No.50446 of 2012, which was confirmed
by the Division Bench in W.A.No.16/2021 disposed of on
05.04.2021.
Vivek M.Hinduja &Amp Ors. vs M.Ashwatha . on 6 December, 2017
2. Before I advert to the facts of the present case,
it would be useful to refer to the judgments rendered by
the Apex Court on this issue in Nekkanti Rama Lakshmi
.vs. State of Karnataka and another 1 and Vivek M.
Hinduja .vs. M. Aswatha2. It would be also useful to
refer to the judgment rendered by a Co-Ordinate Bench of
this Court in W.P.No.50446 of 2012, which was confirmed
by the Division Bench in W.A.No.16/2021 disposed of on
05.04.2021.