Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.45 seconds)Debabrata Bandopadhyay vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 2 July, 1968
In this regard, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Debabrata Bandopadbyay and others versus State of West Bengal and another reported in AIR 1969 SC 189 has held as under:-
Niaz Mohammad And Others, Etc. Etc. vs State Of Haryana And Others on 20 September, 1994
6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Niaz Mohammad and others versus State of Haryana and others reported in 1994 (6) SCC 332 has held as under:-
Mrityunjoy Das & Anr vs Sayed Hasibur Rahaman & Ors on 16 March, 2001
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mrityunjoy Das and another versus Sayed Hasibur Rahaman and others reported in 2002 (3) SCC 739 has held as under :-
Murray And Co vs Ashok Kr. Newatia And Anr on 25 January, 2000
It is in this context that the observations of the this Court in Murray's case (supra) in which one of us (Banerjee, J.) was party needs to be noticed.
Anil Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U.P. & Another on 20 August, 2004
2. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the judgment and order dated 19.12.2018 passed by the writ Court in Writ Petition (S/S) No.2697 of 2018 In re: Anil Kumar Srivastava vs. State of U.P. and others.
The Aligarh Municipal Board And Ors. vs Ekka Tonga Mazdoor Union And Ors. on 4 August, 1970
In The Aligarh Municipal Board and Others v. Ekka Tonga Mazdoor Union and Others MANU/SC/0075/1970 : 1970CriL J1520 , this Court in no uncertain term stated that in order to bring home a charge of contempt of court for disobeying orders of Courts, those who assert that the alleged contemners had knowledge of the order must prove this fact beyond reasonable doubt. This Court went on to observe that in case of doubt, the benefit ought to go to the person charged.
V.G. Nigam And Others vs Kedar Nath Gupta And Another on 24 September, 1992
In a similar vein in V.G. Nigam and others v. Kedar Nath Gupta and another MANU/SC/0419/1992 : 1992CriL J3576 , this Court stated that it would be rather hazardous to impose sentence for contempt on the authorities in exercise of contempt jurisdiction on mere probabilities.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Smt. Archana Guha vs Ranjit Alias Runu Guha Neogi And Ors. on 5 March, 1990
In this context, the observations of the Calcutta High Court in Archana Guha v. Ranjit Guha Neogi 1989 (II) CHN 252 in which one of us was a party (Banerjee, J.) seem to be rather apposite and we do lend credence to the same and thus record our concurrence therewith.
1