Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs & Central ... on 1 January, 2014

o Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2009 (243) ELT 270 (T) o Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2010 (253) ELT 642 (T) o Hindustan Coca Cola Vs. CCE - 2007 (220) ELT 908 (T) o Kandhari Beverages (P) Ltd. - 2008 (224) ELT 265 (T) o Bharat Coca-Cola Bottling N.E. P. Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2007 (216) ELT 548 (T)  Suggestion by Ld. AR that the present appeal is not maintainable before the Hon'ble CESTAT in view of Section 35B(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is incorrect and erroneous.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Lakshmi Sugar And Oil Mills Ltd. vs Cce on 5 April, 1991

7. We observe that the Tribunal in the case of Shiva Essential Oils & Chemicals v. CCE, Noida cited supra, has not considered the decision in Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.'s case nor was it cited before them. Loss, whether it occurs due to unavoidable accident or otherwise, is a loss. So long as such loss occurs in storage, it is a loss referred to in Section 35B proviso.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 42 - Full Document

Suchitra Components Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise,Guntur on 17 January, 2007

o Suchitra Components Ltd. Vs CCE - 2007 (208) ELT 321 (SC) o Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE - 2008 (221) ELT 512 (T - LB) Affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE Vs. Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT A14 (SC) o Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs Collector of CE - 1996 88 ELT 355 (T) o Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2006 (203) ELT 102 (T)  Since the breakages were within the permissible limits, the same were allowed to be written off and no remission application was to be filed for the same by the appellants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 82 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Customs & Central ... vs M/S. Ratio Pharma India Pvt. Ltd on 22 June, 2015

o Suchitra Components Ltd. Vs CCE - 2007 (208) ELT 321 (SC) o Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE - 2008 (221) ELT 512 (T - LB) Affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE Vs. Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT A14 (SC) o Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs Collector of CE - 1996 88 ELT 355 (T) o Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2006 (203) ELT 102 (T)  Since the breakages were within the permissible limits, the same were allowed to be written off and no remission application was to be filed for the same by the appellants.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 5 - Cited by 7 - Full Document
1   2 Next