Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)
Pepsi Co (I) Holdings Pvt Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Esxise- Mumbai ... on 27 September, 2022
cites
M/S Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd vs Cce, Chandigarh Ii on 22 July, 2015
o Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2010
(261) ELT 567 (T)
o Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2013
(289) ELT 162 (T)
o Final Order No. 50355/2014 dated 29.1.2014 passed
by the Hon'ble CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of
Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs & Central ... on 1 January, 2014
o Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. Vs. CCE -
2009 (243) ELT 270 (T)
o Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE -
2010 (253) ELT 642 (T)
o Hindustan Coca Cola Vs. CCE - 2007 (220) ELT 908
(T)
o Kandhari Beverages (P) Ltd. - 2008 (224) ELT 265
(T)
o Bharat Coca-Cola Bottling N.E. P. Ltd. Vs. CCE -
2007 (216) ELT 548 (T)
Suggestion by Ld. AR that the present appeal is not
maintainable before the Hon'ble CESTAT in view of Section
35B(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is incorrect and
erroneous.
Pepsico (I) Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 8 November, 2017
8. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central
Excise, 2006 (201) ELT 69 (Tri.).
Lakshmi Sugar And Oil Mills Ltd. vs Cce on 5 April, 1991
7. We observe that the Tribunal in the case of Shiva Essential
Oils & Chemicals v. CCE, Noida cited supra, has not considered
the decision in Lakshmiji Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.'s case nor was it
cited before them. Loss, whether it occurs due to unavoidable
accident or otherwise, is a loss. So long as such loss occurs in
storage, it is a loss referred to in Section 35B proviso.
Suchitra Components Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise,Guntur on 17 January, 2007
o Suchitra Components Ltd. Vs CCE - 2007 (208) ELT
321 (SC)
o Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE - 2008 (221) ELT 512
(T - LB) Affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE
Vs. Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT A14
(SC)
o Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs Collector of CE - 1996 88 ELT 355
(T)
o Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2006 (203) ELT
102 (T)
Since the breakages were within the permissible limits, the
same were allowed to be written off and no remission
application was to be filed for the same by the appellants.
M/S Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. ... vs Commr. Of Central Excise & Service Tax, ... on 22 March, 2011
9. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of
Central Excise, 2009 (243) ELT 270 (Tri.).
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Pepsi Foods Ltd. (Now Pepsico India ... on 6 April, 2021
7. Commissioner Vs, Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. 2013 (287)
ELT A129 CAL.
Commissioner Of Customs & Central ... vs M/S. Ratio Pharma India Pvt. Ltd on 22 June, 2015
o Suchitra Components Ltd. Vs CCE - 2007 (208) ELT
321 (SC)
o Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE - 2008 (221) ELT 512
(T - LB) Affirmed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in CCE
Vs. Bezel Pharma Pvt. Ltd. - 2010 (255) ELT A14
(SC)
o Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs Collector of CE - 1996 88 ELT 355
(T)
o Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2006 (203) ELT
102 (T)
Since the breakages were within the permissible limits, the
same were allowed to be written off and no remission
application was to be filed for the same by the appellants.