Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.70 seconds)

Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997

"Provided that where there is a complaint of sexual harassment within the meaning of Rule 3-C of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964, the Complaints Committee established in each Ministry or Department or Office for inquiring into such complaints, shall be deemed to be the inquiring authority appointed by the disciplinary authority for the purpose of these rules and the Complaints Committee shall hold, if separate procedure has not been prescribed for the Complaints Committee for holding the inquiry into the complaints of sexual harassment, the inquiry as far as practicable in accordance with the procedure laid down in these rules."
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 569 - Full Document

Nisha Priya Bhatia vs Union Of India And Ors on 15 January, 2010

In case the procedure laid down in para 7(a) of the SOP is followed in terms of interpretation given by the respondents, then in case of State Gazetted Police Service Officer, the disciplinary authority will come into picture only after completion of formal inquiry by the ICC, which would be in absolute derogation to the provisions of not only the Act of 2013, but also CCS(CCA) Rules and the detailed guidelines dated 16.07.2015 issued by Government of ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:03:29 :::CIS 31 India. It is not the case of the respondents that they can conduct the inquiry against the petitioner into the complaint dehors the provisions of CCS(CCA) Rules, Act of 2013, the Office .
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 26 - H S Bedi - Full Document
1