Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.27 seconds)Section 3 in The National Highways Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Anoop Agrawal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 November, 2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited the
judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of this
Court in Writ Petition No.9395/2019 titled as Anoop
Agrawal Vs. State of M.P. & others dated 6.11.2020.
Chimanlal Hargovinddas vs Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 21 July, 1988
In the case of CHIMANLAL HARGOVINDDAS vs.
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, POONA, the Apex
Court has enumerated various aspects pertaining to
the determination of market value by the Reference
Court. Some of them which are material for the
present purpose are as follows:-
Badku vs State Of Chhattisgarh 62 Wpc/638/2019 ... on 25 February, 2019
NC: 2024:KHC:48844
WP No. 10335 of 2024
C/W WP No. 10467 of 2024
In that case also the Commissioner, Sagar Division,
Sagar in purported exercise of the power under
Section 3G(5) of the Act, while setting aside the
award passed by the competent authority h a s
remanded the matter to him for fresh determination
of compensation. This Court relying on the judgment
of the Coordinate Bench in Writ Petition
No.18374/2014 (Santosh Soni Vs. National Highway
Authority) and connected writ petitions decided on
23.1.2015 and earlier decision in Writ Petition
No.5883/2011 (Radheshyam Vs. National Highway
Authority) decided on 11.10.2011 held that reading
of sub-section (6) of Section 3G of the Act, which
has applied the
Radheshyam Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 51 Mcrc/927/2019 ... on 19 February, 2019
NC: 2024:KHC:48844
WP No. 10335 of 2024
C/W WP No. 10467 of 2024
In that case also the Commissioner, Sagar Division,
Sagar in purported exercise of the power under
Section 3G(5) of the Act, while setting aside the
award passed by the competent authority h a s
remanded the matter to him for fresh determination
of compensation. This Court relying on the judgment
of the Coordinate Bench in Writ Petition
No.18374/2014 (Santosh Soni Vs. National Highway
Authority) and connected writ petitions decided on
23.1.2015 and earlier decision in Writ Petition
No.5883/2011 (Radheshyam Vs. National Highway
Authority) decided on 11.10.2011 held that reading
of sub-section (6) of Section 3G of the Act, which
has applied the