Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.22 seconds)Section 34 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Smt. Sawarni vs Smt. Inder Kaur And Others on 23 August, 1996
(1973) 2
SCC 60 [Ram Saran and another Vs. Smt. Ganga Devi], (1996) 6 SCC
223 [Sawarni (Smt) Vs. Inder Kaur (Smt) and others], (2019) 10 SCC
259 [Prahlad Pradhan and others Vs. Sonu Kumhar and others],
(2015) 5 SCC 725 [Municipal Corporation, Gwalior Vs. Puran Singh
alias Puran Chand and others], (2004) 12 SCC 58 [Suman Verma Vs.
Union of India and others], (2019) 3 SCC 191 [Bhima Bai Mahadeo
Kambekar (dead) through legal representative Vs. Arthur Import and
Export Company and others] and also 2012 (1) MPLJ 114 [Gangadhar
Vs. Bhanwaribai].
Prahlad Pradhan vs Sonu Kumhar on 16 October, 2019
(1973) 2
SCC 60 [Ram Saran and another Vs. Smt. Ganga Devi], (1996) 6 SCC
223 [Sawarni (Smt) Vs. Inder Kaur (Smt) and others], (2019) 10 SCC
259 [Prahlad Pradhan and others Vs. Sonu Kumhar and others],
(2015) 5 SCC 725 [Municipal Corporation, Gwalior Vs. Puran Singh
alias Puran Chand and others], (2004) 12 SCC 58 [Suman Verma Vs.
Union of India and others], (2019) 3 SCC 191 [Bhima Bai Mahadeo
Kambekar (dead) through legal representative Vs. Arthur Import and
Export Company and others] and also 2012 (1) MPLJ 114 [Gangadhar
Vs. Bhanwaribai].
Municipal Corpn., Gwalior vs Puran Singh @ Puran Chand & Ors on 2 July, 2014
(1973) 2
SCC 60 [Ram Saran and another Vs. Smt. Ganga Devi], (1996) 6 SCC
223 [Sawarni (Smt) Vs. Inder Kaur (Smt) and others], (2019) 10 SCC
259 [Prahlad Pradhan and others Vs. Sonu Kumhar and others],
(2015) 5 SCC 725 [Municipal Corporation, Gwalior Vs. Puran Singh
alias Puran Chand and others], (2004) 12 SCC 58 [Suman Verma Vs.
Union of India and others], (2019) 3 SCC 191 [Bhima Bai Mahadeo
Kambekar (dead) through legal representative Vs. Arthur Import and
Export Company and others] and also 2012 (1) MPLJ 114 [Gangadhar
Vs. Bhanwaribai].
Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008
8. The Supreme Court in a case reported in (2008) 4 SCC 594
[Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) by Lrs. and others],
considering the aspect as to under what circumstances, the suit for
declaration and permanent injunction that too without claiming
consequential relief of possession is maintainable, has observed as under:-
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
C.Mohammed Yunus vs Syed Unissa And Others on 14 February, 1961
9. Similarly, the Supreme Court in a case reported in AIR 1961 SC
808 [C. Mohammad Yunus Vs. Syed Unnissa and others] has observed
as under:-