Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)
Gohla Rani & Ors vs Mithu Singh & Ors on 29 January, 2024 cites

Sudama Devi And Ors. vs Kewal Ram And Ors. on 28 November, 2007

13. Submitting in this regard, learned counsel contended that conclusion and inferences drawn by the learned Tribunal are against facts and evidence. A prayer is made to allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment, with further prayer for grant of Rs.20 lacs to claimants, by allowing their petition. To support his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on Ramphal vs. Baljit Singh, 2013(1) PLR 790; Sudama Devi and Other vs. Kewal Ram and Others, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 72; National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar and Others, 2011(2) RCR (Civil) 242; Kusum Lata and Others vs. Satbir and Others, 2011(3) SCC 646 and Bimla Devi and Others vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Others, 2009(13) SCC 530.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Kusum & Ors vs Satbir & Ors on 2 March, 2011

13. Submitting in this regard, learned counsel contended that conclusion and inferences drawn by the learned Tribunal are against facts and evidence. A prayer is made to allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment, with further prayer for grant of Rs.20 lacs to claimants, by allowing their petition. To support his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on Ramphal vs. Baljit Singh, 2013(1) PLR 790; Sudama Devi and Other vs. Kewal Ram and Others, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 72; National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar and Others, 2011(2) RCR (Civil) 242; Kusum Lata and Others vs. Satbir and Others, 2011(3) SCC 646 and Bimla Devi and Others vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Others, 2009(13) SCC 530.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 854 - Full Document

Bimla Devi & Ors vs Himachal Road Transport Corpn. & Ors on 15 April, 2009

13. Submitting in this regard, learned counsel contended that conclusion and inferences drawn by the learned Tribunal are against facts and evidence. A prayer is made to allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment, with further prayer for grant of Rs.20 lacs to claimants, by allowing their petition. To support his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on Ramphal vs. Baljit Singh, 2013(1) PLR 790; Sudama Devi and Other vs. Kewal Ram and Others, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 72; National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar and Others, 2011(2) RCR (Civil) 242; Kusum Lata and Others vs. Satbir and Others, 2011(3) SCC 646 and Bimla Devi and Others vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Others, 2009(13) SCC 530.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 2658 - S B Sinha - Full Document

National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sanjay Kumar Sharma on 8 September, 2015

13. Submitting in this regard, learned counsel contended that conclusion and inferences drawn by the learned Tribunal are against facts and evidence. A prayer is made to allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment, with further prayer for grant of Rs.20 lacs to claimants, by allowing their petition. To support his arguments, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance on Ramphal vs. Baljit Singh, 2013(1) PLR 790; Sudama Devi and Other vs. Kewal Ram and Others, 2008(2) RCR (Civil) 72; National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar and Others, 2011(2) RCR (Civil) 242; Kusum Lata and Others vs. Satbir and Others, 2011(3) SCC 646 and Bimla Devi and Others vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Others, 2009(13) SCC 530.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1