Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.30 seconds)

Jagjit Singh vs Divisional Commissioner on 30 July, 2012

In view of the judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Jagjit Singh's case (Supra) as well as Gurdish Singh and another's case (Supra), it is apparent that the function performed by the revenue authorities pertaining to entering/sanctioning of mutations is only an administrative function and does not create or extinguish any right or title in the land and the right or title in the property is to be decided by the Civil Court and the said process does not involve any adjudicatory process of resolution of disputes amongst the parties and thus, this Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is not to interfere in such matters.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Gurdish Singh And Another vs The Financial Commissioner on 9 November, 2009

In view of the judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Jagjit Singh's case (Supra) as well as Gurdish Singh and another's case (Supra), it is apparent that the function performed by the revenue authorities pertaining to entering/sanctioning of mutations is only an administrative function and does not create or extinguish any right or title in the land and the right or title in the property is to be decided by the Civil Court and the said process does not involve any adjudicatory process of resolution of disputes amongst the parties and thus, this Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is not to interfere in such matters.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - S S Saron - Full Document
1   2 Next