Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.43 seconds)Section 223 in The Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Lakshmimoni Das And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 8 July, 1987
97.1. The Full Bench decision of the Calcutta High Court
in Lakshmimoni Das [Lakshmimoni Das v. State of W.B., 1987 SCC
OnLine Cal 140 : AIR 1987 Cal 326] is affirmed.
97.2. The structure, as put up by the appellants and/or their
predecessors, had been pucca structure on the property in question.
97.3. For the structure being pucca in character and the term of lease
being 20 years, the appellants and/or their predecessors were not
thika tenants within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the 1949 Act.
97.4. The appellants and/or their predecessors were not thika tenants
within the meaning of the 1981 Act for two major reasons:
Nemai Chandra Kumar (D) Thr. Lrs. And ... vs Mani Square Ltd on 27 July, 2022
36. Admittedly, the lease of Bibhuti Bhusan expired in 2003 and there
were existing pucca structures. In the decision of Nemai Chandra Kumar
(dead) Thr. Lrs. And Ors. v. Mani Square Ltd. and Ors., reported in
(2024) 17 SCC 743, the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows:-
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 2 in Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act 1949 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act 1949 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act 1949 [Entire Act]
Surjeet Singh Sahni vs State Of U.P. on 28 February, 2022
- Golabari, Ward No. 60, Howrah - 711101. Thus, this is not a case in
which delay is fatal. The delay is not attributable to the petitioner. The
petitioner was not sleeping over its right. The decision of Surjeet Singh
Sahni (supra) is not applicable to the case.