Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.30 seconds)
Navjot Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 May, 2022 cites

Harsh Kumar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. on 5 February, 2014

Further submissions have been made that against the decision in the case of Harsh Kumar (supra), when Special Leave Petition was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, counsel appearing for NCTE, on instructions, supported the decision of Division Bench of Allahabad High Court claiming that the judgment rendered by the High Court is absolutely correct and does not (Downloaded on 26/05/2022 at 08:52:20 PM) (17 of 28) [CW-4089/2022] warrant any interference, whereafter, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed on 13/1/2015.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 14 - D Gupta - Full Document

Ram Sharan Maurya vs State Of U. P. on 18 November, 2020

So far as the judgment cited by learned counsel for the petitioners in the case of Ram Sharan Maurya (supra) is concerned, there is no dispute that the NCTE under Section 23(1) of the RTE Act is empowered to provide for the qualifications. However, the qualifications as prescribed have to be applied to the (Downloaded on 26/05/2022 at 08:52:20 PM) (28 of 28) [CW-4089/2022] facts of the case and cannot be followed mechanically only so as to lead to an undesirable conclusion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 77 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Government Of Maharashtra And Ors vs M/S. Deokar'S Distillery on 10 March, 2003

Reliance has been placed on Govt. of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Deokar's Distillery : (2003) 5 SCC 669, Amarjeet Singh & Ors. vs. Devi Ratan & Ors. : (2010) 1 SCC 417, N.Kannadasan vs. Ajoy Khose & Ors. : (2009) 7 SCC 1, Government (NCT of Delhi) vs. Union of India & Ors. : (2018) 8 SCC 501, H. Suresh Nathan & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. : (1992) Supp.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 77 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

N.Kannadasan vs Ajoy Khose & Ors on 6 May, 2009

As the plain reading of the notification, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners would lead to a strange (Downloaded on 26/05/2022 at 08:52:20 PM) (27 of 28) [CW-4089/2022] situation, as noticed hereinbefore, the notification has to be given a purposive interpretation as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of N.Kannadasan (supra), wherein, under the heading 'Purposive interpretation', it was laid down as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 94 - Cited by 149 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1