Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.37 seconds)

U.Suvetha vs State By Insp.Of Police & Anr on 6 May, 2009

7. Perused the record. The complaint would disclose that the allegations made by the 2nd respondent were mainly against her husband i.e. A1. Except contending that A1 was having extra marital affair with the petitioner herein, no specific allegations were made by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner herein. As per the judgment Dr.GRR,J 4 CrlP.No.9974 of 2013 of the Hon'ble Apex Court in U. Suvetha v. State1, a girl friend or a concubine being not connected by blood or marriage is not a relative of the husband as per Section 498-A IPC and they cannot be implicated in a case under Section 498-A IPC. Section 497 IPC was struck down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Joseph shine v. Union of India2. Hence, as the allegations in the complaint would not attract against the petitioner herein, it is considered fit to allow the petition.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 127 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1