Ranjana Purvey @ Ranjana Kumari & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 26 August, 2010
e
At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners has
ad
placed before this Court an order passed by this Court in W.P
Pr
No.10690/2018 (Anil Kumar Yadav vs. The High Court of M.P.),
whereby this Court, following the order passed by Hon'ble Supreme
a
hy
Court in W.P (C) No.431/2018 (Ranjana and another vs. The State
of M.P. and another), has directed that the petitioners in that case be
ad
permitted to appear in the preliminary examination to be conducted on
M
1.7.2018. However, the result of the petitioners shall be kept in a
sealed cover. In that case the challenge was to the fixation of age in
of
Rule 7(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service
rt
(Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules 2017. The same is
ou
under challenge in this petition also.