Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.30 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 54 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
M/S Ultra Tech Cement Limited vs Mast Ram on 18 January, 2023
30. The contention raised by the petitioner qua the payment
of awarded amount by M/s Ultra Tech, in pursuance to the
supplementary award dated 02.05.2022 and thereby making
M/s Ultra Tech liable for payment, in the case at hand, is devoid
of any merit. In this respect, suffice it to state that the main
award bearing No.1 of 2008 was passed on 10.01.2008. At the
time of passing of the initial award, the award qua structures,
houses, trees etc. existing on the acquired land, could not be
passed. The supplementary award was the next step in the
proceedings, which resulted in award dated 02.05.2022 being
passed. Admittedly, the acquisition proceedings had
commenced before the effective date of the scheme, i.e.,
29.06.2017 and the compensation had remained undetermined
as on the effective date. Hence, in view of the judgment passed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. vs.
Mast Ram and others (supra), there is no force in the said
contention.
Section 14 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
M/S Ultratech Cement Ltd vs State Of H.P. And Ors on 8 August, 2018
UltraTech Cement Ltd. and the payment with respect to the
same. In this respect, attention is invited to Annexure P-6 i.e.
Supplementary Award dated 02.05.2022, regarding left out
houses/structures and trees under the main Award No.1 of
2008, passed on 10.01.2008. From a perusal of the main
award, it is evident that initially while passing the Award, an
award qua structures/houses/trees etc. could not be passed in
the Award No.1 of 2008, dated 10.01.2008, as
assessment/evaluation of the aforesaid, could not be done on
account of resistance put-forth by the landowners. The
Supplementary Award is dated 02.05.2022. Qua the same, it is
contended that the said supplementary award was passed at
the instance of respondent No.1, who had filed a writ petition
bearing No.3073 of 2021, titled M/s. UltraTech Cement Works
Vs. State of HP and Others being aggrieved of executive
inaction on the part of the State in not passing a Supplementary
Award qua houses, structures and tress not evaluated at the
::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2025 21:27:35 :::CIS
15
2025:HHC:29847
time of passing the main Award No.1 of 2008, dated
10.01.2008. In the same, the following relief was claimed;