Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.33 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
In Associate Builders (supra) fundamental policy of India has
been explained to mean that the arbitrator must have a judicial approach
and he must not act perversely. The relevant portion of the said judgment
is quoted herein below:-
Sudarsan Trading Co vs Govt. Of Kerala & Anr on 14 February, 1989
24. S. Mukharji, J. As his Lordship then was, speaking for the
Bench in Sudarsan Trading Co. v. State of Kerala, while examining the
jurisdiction of the Court under Section 30 held as under"
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Arm Group Enterprises Ltd vs Waldorf Restaurant & Ors on 1 April, 2003
11. He referred to the decisions, namely, Associate Builders Vs.
Delhi Development Authority reported in (2015) 3 SCC 49, Oil and
Natural Gas Corporation Limited Vs. Western GECO International
Limited reported in (2014) 9 SCC 263, R. C. Lahoti and Arun Kumar,
JJ. Vs. Bondar Singh and Others, Appellants v. Nihal Singh and Others
reported in AIR 2003 SC 1905, C. E. S. C. Ltd. Vs. Rup Kumar Barik
and Others reported in AIR 2003 CAL 195, ARM Group Enterprises Ltd.
Vs. Waldorf Restaurant and Others reported in (2003) SCC 423, Uttam
Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. Vs. United Bank of India and Others reported
in (2000) 7 SCC 120,