Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.69 seconds)Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Factories Act, 1948
Kishori Lal Verma vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd. And Anr. on 19 August, 1994
besides, being prerogative of the management to transfer the
workman to the place of their choice keeping in view the
exigency of work. The proposition of law laid down by our own
Hon'ble High Court in G.S. Puri Vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(supra) and by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Kishori Lal
Verma Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. & Anr. (supra) is squarely
applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, this contention
raised by the workman is also without any merits and any
substance.
G.S. Puri vs Indian Oil Corporation on 9 February, 1996
besides, being prerogative of the management to transfer the
workman to the place of their choice keeping in view the
exigency of work. The proposition of law laid down by our own
Hon'ble High Court in G.S. Puri Vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(supra) and by the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Kishori Lal
Verma Vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. & Anr. (supra) is squarely
applicable to the facts of this case. Therefore, this contention
raised by the workman is also without any merits and any
substance.
Gen. Marketing And Manufacturing Co. ... vs The Presiding Officer And Others on 1 September, 1999
outside Delhi and the workman would not have a right to object
to the same. Once these are the service conditions relating to
his transfer, it cannot be said that the workman could not be
transferred to Rama Road Factory which was opened after his
appointment with the management. If the said contention of the
workman is accepted, it would mean that he can be transferred
to any other factory or sale depot of the management anywhere
in Delhi or outside Delhi which was in existence as on the date
of his appointment but not to the factory / factories which were
set up by the management after his appointment. Such a
position cannot be accepted in law and it would make the very
condition of the service regarding transferability to any other
factory or sale depot in and outside Delhi redundant. The
proposition of law laid down by our own Hon'ble High Court in
General Marketing and Manufacturing Company Ltd. Vs.
Presiding Officer and others (supra) is squarely applicable to
the facts of this case. Applying the same, it is held that the
Contd...
The Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954
Birla Corporation Ltd. vs First Industrial Tribunal And Ors. on 10 February, 2006
Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Birla
Corporation Ltd. Vs. First Industrial Tribunal and others
(supra) has laid down as under :-
G. Srinivasan vs National Thermal Power Corporation ... on 12 February, 2002
(supra), Union of India & Anr. Vs. N.P. Thomas (supra) and
G. Srinivasan Vs. National Thermal Power Corporation,
Ltd. (supra) is squarely applicable to the case in hand.