Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.28 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Article 23 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S. Govindaraju vs K.S.R.T.C. & Anr on 15 April, 1986
13. Mr. M. Mridul, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, has contended that although the question of validity of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Act was raised before their Lordships of the Supreme Court in S. Govindaraju v. Karnataka S.R.T.C. 1986-II-LLJ-351 but as the matter was decided on some other point, that question was left open. Their Lordships observed that the validity of Section 2(oo)(bb) was not challenged before us. In that case, it was contended before their Lordships that if the view of the High Court is accepted, it would enable unscrupulous employers to provide a stipulation in the contract of service for terminating the employment of the employees to escape the rigours of Section 25F of the Act. This would further confer arbitrary powers on the employers which would be destructive of the protection granted by the Act to the employees. Their Lordships further observed (at p. 353):
Dilip Hanumantrao Shirke And Others vs Zilla Parishad Yavatmal And Others on 25 July, 1989
16. Our attention was next drawn to a decision of the Bombay High Court in DilipM. Shirke v. Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, wherein it has been observed as follows 1990-I-LLJ-445 at 448: