Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 42 (0.44 seconds)Birad Mal Singhvi vs Anand Purohit on 2 August, 1988
It was held as
under : (Birad Mal Singhvi case [Birad Mal Singhvi v.
Anand Purohit, 1988 Supp SCC 604] , SCC p. 618, para
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Kona Prabhakara Rao vs M. Seshagiri Rao And Anr. on 9 April, 1980
(2) The allegations in the election petition should not
be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials
or frivolous or vexatious because the court is
empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike
down or delete pleadings which are suffering from
such vices as not raising any triable issue vide
Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599:
(1974) 1 SCR 52] , Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M.
Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar
Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC
93] .
Section 22 in Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 [Entire Act]
Ramji Prasad Singh vs Ram Bilas Jha & Four Ors on 24 September, 1976
(6) The onus of proof of the allegations made in the
election petition is undoubtedly on the person who
assails an election which has been concluded vide
Rahim Khan v. Khurshid Ahmed [(1974) 2 SCC 660],
Mohan Singh v. Bhanwarlal [(1964) 5 SCR 12: AIR
1964 SC 1366] and Ramji Prasad Singh v. Ram Bilas
Jha [(1977) 1 SCC 260]."
Rahim Khan vs Khurshid Ahmed & Ors on 8 August, 1974
of the contents. It is also clear that Ex.A1 is not a "certified
copy". The citation in C. Doddanarayana Reddy case (7
8
(2005) 3 SCC 702
9
AIR 1971 SC 1944
17
supra) relied on by learned counsel for the petitioner
supports this contention.
Dhartipakar Madan Lal Agarwal vs Rajiv Gandhi on 11 May, 1987
(2) The allegations in the election petition should not
be vague, general in nature or lacking of materials
or frivolous or vexatious because the court is
empowered at any stage of the proceedings to strike
down or delete pleadings which are suffering from
such vices as not raising any triable issue vide
Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 599:
(1974) 1 SCR 52] , Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M.
Seshagiri Rao [(1982) 1 SCC 442] and Dhartipakar
Madan Lal Agarwal v. Rajiv Gandhi [1987 Supp SCC
93] .