Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.23 seconds)
Arun Kumar vs Estate Officer on 12 April, 2019 cites

Nirmala Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh 40 Wps/432/2017 ... on 18 May, 2018

3.3 Officials of respondent converted the said blank forms into inspection report alleging that the rooftop had been let out by the present appellant to two persons namely Saurabh Ganguly and Rajiv Ranjan. Appellant was not granted reasonable opportunity to present his case and PPA No. 37/2017 Arun Kumar Vs. Estate Officer & Anr. Page 3 of 21 pages the allotment cancellation order dated 19.01.2017 was passed and appeal against the said order also was dismissed.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4774 - M M Shrivastava - Full Document

Union Of India & Another vs Sunil Dutt on 27 January, 2010

In the case of Union of India vs Sunil Dutt, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 314, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court rejected the contention of Union of India that mere filing of the inspection report proves the contents thereof. It was also held by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that mere presence of some family member or friend or relative of the government servant in the government accommodation at the time of inspection is not sufficient to draw inference of subletting of the government accommodation.
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - S Khanna - Full Document

Ex. Havaldar Kailash Singh And Sons vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 2 September, 2003

In the case of Ex Havaldar Kailash Singh vs Union of India, 106 (2003) DLT 660, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that grounds have to be categorically and clearly specified in the notice under Section 4 of the Act in order to enable the noticee to take all objections that are available to him under law and where grounds specified under Section 4 of the Act are different from the grounds mentioned in the eviction order, the eviction order cannot be sustained since it could not be said then that the noticee had reasonable opportunity of meeting the grounds. The very purpose of Section 4 is to make a so­called unauthorized occupant aware of the grounds on which he is sought to be evicted from the public premises. In the present case, the notice under Section 4 of the Act is totally silent and makes not even a whisper of the alleged illegal tenancy as a ground of eviction.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 10 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

J.P. Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh 26 Wps/1923/2018 ... on 12 July, 2018

25. Similarly, the judgment in the case of J.P. Yadav (supra) relied upon by learned counsel for respondents was on totally distinct facts in so far as in the said case the appellant had taken shifting stands as regards presence of two persons in the premises and the appellant of that case could not establish that the allotted accommodation was in his occupation and the documents produced by him had been got prepared subsequent to the commencement of proceedings.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1