Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.34 seconds)The Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957
Section 24 in The Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Indore Development Authority vs Manoharlal And Ors. Etc. on 6 March, 2020
32. After the judgment in Indore Development Authority Vs.
Manoharlal (supra), it is now settled law that deemed lapse of
the land in acquisition proceedings applies only when
authorities have failed due to their inaction to take possession.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the
considered opinion of the court there is no inaction on the part
of DDA to take possession of the suit property. There was no
inaction on the part of defendant to demolish the property and
take the physical possession thereof. As such, the plaintiff
cannot take the advantage of his own wrong.
Shri Hoshiyar Singh Bagri vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr. on 31 March, 2011
As the Hon'ble High Court has held in Hoshiyar Singh Vs.
DDA that:
Mohan Lal vs Mohan Singh on 7 October, 1994
(iii). 1995 PLJ Mohan Lal V/S Mohan Singh.
Prem Chand Sharma And Co. vs Dda And Anr. on 8 November, 2005
"the plea that the built up areas cannot be acquired
was repelled by the Division Bench of this Court in the
judgment reported as M/s Prem Chand Ramesh Chand Vs.
Delhi Development Authority & another 66 (1997) Delhi Law
Times 110. The operative portion in paragraphs 6 and 7 read
as follows:
Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc, Mohd. Aslam, ... vs Union Of India And Others on 24 October, 1994
"7. The contention in respect of the policy of leaving out from
the acquisition built up area has also been repelled in
another Division Bench decision of this Court in Shri
Bhagwan and another Vs. Union of India & ors., 1991 (2)
Delhi Lawyer 59 (DB).
Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Godrej And Boyce on 27 October, 1987
(a). AIR 1987 SC 2421 titled as Special Land Officer,
Bombay & Others Vs. Godrej & Boyeed.