Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 52 (1.67 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952
The Employees’ Provident Funds And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
The Chairman, Railway Board & Ors vs Mrs. Chandrima Das & Ors on 28 January, 2000
(15) Chairman Railway Board and others vs. Chandrima das
(MRS ) and others37
(16) K. Thimmappa and others vs. Chairman, Central Board
of Directors, State Bank of India and another38
(17) Director General, Central Reserve Police Force and
others vs. Janardan Singh and others39
(18) Employees Provident Fund Organization vs. Rollwell
Forge Ltd.,40
(19) Battula Veeraswamy vs. The Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner, Barkathpura, Hyderabad and others41
(20) Kay Iron Works Private Ltd., Satara Vs. Union of India,
Ministry of Labour, through its Secretary and another42
(21) Steel Authority of India Ltd. and others vs. National
Union Waterfront Workers and others43
(22) Ashok Leyland Employees' Union (Reg. No.2286) rep.
Mafatlal Group Staff Association And ... vs Regional Commissioner, Provident Fund ... on 29 March, 1994
(24) S. Kothandaraman vs. Union of India (by Secretary to
Government, Ministry of Law, New Delhi) and others46
(25) Provident Fund Inspector, Quilon vs. Kerala Janatha
Printers and Publishers (P) Ltd., Trivandrum and
another47
(27) Kay Iron Works Pvt. Ltd. A Company vs. Union of India
(UOI) Ministry of Labour, through its Secretary and
another 48
(28) Sachin Vijay Desai vs. Union of India and others49
(29) Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited vs.
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and others50
(30) Employees Provident Fund Commissioner vs. Official
Liquidator of Esskay Pharmaceuticals Limited51
(31) Kallakkurichi Taluk Retired Officials Association, Tamil
Nadu and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu52
(32) Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Patiala vs. Mangal
Singh and ohters53
(33) Mafatlal Group Staff Association and others vs. Regional
Commissioner Provident Fund and others54
46
W.A.No.122 & 589/1981 etc. DD 02.12.1982 High Court of Madras
47
(1964) SCC Online Ker 191
48
(2007) (1) L.L.N. 919 Bombay
49
SLP No.24867/2019
50
(2009) 10 SCC 123
51
(2011) 10 SCC 727
52
(2013) 2 SCC 772
53
(2011) 11 SCC 702
54
(1994) 4 SCC 58
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 7 in The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 [Entire Act]
Lachmandas Kewalram Ahuja vs State Of Bombay on 20 May, 1952
The Apex Court, later in State
of West Bengal vs. Anwar Ali Sarkarhabib Mohamed61
and Lachmandas Kawalram Ahuja vs. State of
Bombay62, gave deliberate consideration to the well settled
principles underlying the guarantee in Article 14 of the
Constitution.