Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.53 seconds)Western Engineering Co. vs Paul Engineering Co. on 10 March, 1967
(26) In Western Engineering Co. v. Paul Engineering Co. : , while dealing with an application for cancellation and/revocation of a design, observed as follows
"READMGSs. 51-A and 2(5) of the Patents and Designs Act, it appears that a subsequent design should be self same or identical design registered earlier. The design, the registration of which is sought to be cancelled under S. 51-A, must not have different features of shape, configuaration, pattern etc. from those of the earlier design. The definition itself lays emphasis on the fact that the sameness of the features is to be decided by the eye. The sameness of the features does not necessarily mean that the two designs must be identical on all points and differ on no point.
Section 479 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in Designs Act, 1911 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in Designs Act, 1911 [Entire Act]
Designs Act, 1911
Section 45 in Designs Act, 1911 [Entire Act]
1