Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.51 seconds)Section 16 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 16 in The Mines Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd vs Shri D. K. Worlikar on 14 March, 1960
it would have been possible to construe that expression in a
broader sense having regard to the wide definition of the
word "industry"; but the notification had deliberately
adopted a different phraseology and had brought within its
purview not the sugar industry as such but the manufacture
of sugar and its by-products. The words of the notification
in that case were "the said Act shall apply to the following
industry, namely, the manufacture of sugar and its by-
products". Therefore on the words of the notification in
that case, the wide implication which might have arisen if
the notification had merely stated that the Act applied to
the sugar industry was cut down by the specific words in the
notification, namely, manufacture of sugar and its by-
products, which would clearly apply only to a part of sugar
industry which dealt with the manufacture of sugar and the
by-products and would not apply to the head office which did
not deal with the actual manufacture but dealt with the
consequent steps following on the manufacture viz., sale and
distribution to customers. In the present case the
notification clearly applied to the industry of mines which
in our opinion is nothing different from mining industry and
must therefore take in the entire industry including the
raising of coal from the colliery as .well as its
distribution, sale and supply to the customers. That case
therefore is of no help to the respondents.
The next case to which reference is made is Messrs.
1