Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.27 seconds)
Sri. Thejas N K vs Sri. Nagabhushana. S. P on 20 January, 2026 cites

Radhey Shyam & Anr vs Chhabi Nath & Ors on 26 February, 2015

NC: 2026:KHC:2896 WP No. 18932 of 2024 HC-KAR and the impugned order passed by the trial court rejecting the impleadment application is in conformity with well settled principles of law governing impleadment of parties and as such, the impugned order cannot be said to suffer from any illegality or infirmity nor the same is said to have resulted in miscarriage of justice warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as held by the Apex Court in Radhey Shyam and Ors v. Chhabi Nath and Ors. [(2015) 5 SCC 423], K.P.Natarajan and Ors. vs. Muthalammal and Ors [AIR 2021 SC 3443] and Mohd. Ali v. V.Jaya [(2022) 10 SCC 477]. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 53 - Cited by 616 - A K Goel - Full Document

K.P. Nataranjan vs Muthalammal on 16 July, 2021

NC: 2026:KHC:2896 WP No. 18932 of 2024 HC-KAR and the impugned order passed by the trial court rejecting the impleadment application is in conformity with well settled principles of law governing impleadment of parties and as such, the impugned order cannot be said to suffer from any illegality or infirmity nor the same is said to have resulted in miscarriage of justice warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as held by the Apex Court in Radhey Shyam and Ors v. Chhabi Nath and Ors. [(2015) 5 SCC 423], K.P.Natarajan and Ors. vs. Muthalammal and Ors [AIR 2021 SC 3443] and Mohd. Ali v. V.Jaya [(2022) 10 SCC 477]. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in the petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 15 - V Ramasubramanian - Full Document
1