Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.24 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Central Inland Water ... vs Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr on 6 April, 1986
In the matter of Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Anr. (supra) the following questions of law had arisen for consideration of the Apex Court in Special Leaves granted by the Court which was dealt with & decide with the following observations:
Bhanwar Lal Verma vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 8 November, 1996
22. As a result of above discussion, I am of the view that the petitioners deserve to succeed and the impugned orders of retrenchment dated 12.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5120/1989 (Chain Singh v. R.S.R.T.C), dated 12.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2848/1989 (Bhanwer Lal v. R.S.R.T.C.), dated 12.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No, 1981/1989 (Desh Raj Singh v. R.S.R.T.C), dated 12.4.1987 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3476/1989 (Munshi Lal v. R.S.R.T.C), dated 12.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4193/1989 (Dayanand Yadav v. R.S.R.T.C), dated 7.9.1987 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3452/89 (Durga Shankar Sharma v. R.S.R.T.C & another), dated 9.3.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3250/89 (Prakash Chandra Choudhry v. R.S.R.T.C), dated 15.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3406/89 (Naresh Kumar Mudgal v. R.S.R.T.C. & another) & dated 7.4.1989 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3533/89 (Brij Mohan v. R.S.R.T.C. Jaipur) are all quashed and set aside. Consequently, the aforesaid writ petitions are allowed with the direction to the respondent Corporation to reinstate the petitioners by issuing suitable orders in this regard within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The respondent Corporation is further directed to fix the petitioners in suitable pay scales treating them as regular employees of the corporation as per their entitlement in accordance with the Rules and shall further be entitled to all consequential benefits.
Ganapathi P. Hegde vs General Manager (Fpu), Karnataka Agro ... on 2 December, 1994
In the matter of Ganpathi P. Hegde v. General Manager (FPU) Karnataka (supra) the Karnataka High Court in the case of temporary appointment of an employee which was challenged by way of writ petition No. 8941/94 decided on 2.12.1994 observed, as under:
L. Robert D'Souza vs The Executive Engineer Southern ... on 16 February, 1982
Goptial Teli v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 1995 (2) WLC 1, Robert D'Souza v. The Executive Engineer, Southern Railway and Anr. AIR 1982 (SC) 854, M. Venugopal v. The Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Anr. 1994 (68) IF & LR 443, Dhakshnamoorthy v. Kancheepuram Central Co-operative Bank and Ors. 1996 (1) LLN 244 and The Managing Director, U.P. Warehousing Corporation and Ors. v. Vijay Narayan Vajpayee .
Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh ... vs Vinay Narayan Vajpayee on 16 January, 1980
Goptial Teli v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 1995 (2) WLC 1, Robert D'Souza v. The Executive Engineer, Southern Railway and Anr. AIR 1982 (SC) 854, M. Venugopal v. The Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Anr. 1994 (68) IF & LR 443, Dhakshnamoorthy v. Kancheepuram Central Co-operative Bank and Ors. 1996 (1) LLN 244 and The Managing Director, U.P. Warehousing Corporation and Ors. v. Vijay Narayan Vajpayee .
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
Placing reliance upon its earlier decision in the matter of Mahendra Singh Gill and Anr. v. The Chief Election Commissioner and Ors. F wherein, the Constitution Bench held that "civil consequence" covers infraction of not merely property or personal right but of civil liberties, material deprivations and non-pecuniary damages. In its comprehensive connotion every thing that affects a citizen in his civil life inflicts a civil consequence.