Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)Section 23 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The National Highways Act, 1956
Section 29 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 1 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Tata Sons ... vs Siva Industries And Holdings Ltd. on 5 January, 2023
(Formerly TATA Sons Ltd.) vs. Siva Industries and
Holdings Ltd. and others, 2023 (1) SCALE 793, held
that the mandate of an Arbitrator is liable to be extended
by the Court, under Section 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Act,
in the following terms:-
Mr.Subash Nayak vs National Highways Authority Of India ... on 30 August, 2010
"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that in
view of the facts stated above the
application may kindly be allowed and the
time limit for completing the Arbitration
proceedings in Arbitration Reference Case
No.94/2023 titled as Subash Chand Vs
NHAI and other pending before the Ld.
Divisional Commissioner (Arbitrator),
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rohan Builders (India) Private ... vs Berger Paints India Limited on 17 October, 2023
"15. Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. (supra)
highlights that an interpretation allowing
an extension application post the expiry
::: Downloaded on - 01/01/2026 20:30:14 :::CIS
2025:HHC:46441 REPORTABLE
10
period would encourage rogue litigants
and render the timeline for making the
award inconsequential. However, it is
apposite to note that under Section
29A(5), the power of the court to
extend the time is to be exercised only
.
M/S Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd vs General Manager, on 18 January, 2019
extension of arbitral proceedings, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in M/s Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. versus General
.
1