Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)

Union Of India vs Deep Chand Sahu on 19 March, 2018

14. We are of the opinion that both the Tribunal and the High Court proceeded on an erroneous legal principle without 6 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH W.P. No. 1738/2015 Union of India Vs. Deep Chand Sahu taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of this case and proceeded as if the stay of disciplinary proceedings is a must in every case where there is a criminal trial on the very same charges, in this background it is not necessary for us to go into second question whether at least Charge 3 by itself could have been permitted to be decided in the departmental enquiry as contended alternatively by the learned counsel for the appellant.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Capt.M. Paul Anthony vs Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. & Anr on 30 March, 1999

The Tribunal by placing reliance on the decision in Capt. M. Paul Anthony Vs. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH W.P. No. 1738/2015 Union of India Vs. Deep Chand Sahu and another [(1993) 3 SCC 679], and G.M. Tank Vs. State of Gujarat and others [(2006) 5 SCC 446] and taking note of the fact that respondent was acquitted of the charges in criminal case, quashed the charge memorandum dated 06/07/2010 and further proceedings thereon with a direction that the respondent shall be entitled for all consequential benefits.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 1683 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1