Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

Commnr.,Central Excise & Customs, ... vs M/S. Larsen & Toubro Ltd on 20 August, 2015

11. From a plain reading of the Section 65(105)(zzzh), it is evident that there is no legal mandate to bifurcate the elements of a composite contract as to service component and material component and /or land component and thus, in absence of such mandate, the value of a composite contract cannot be disintegrated for the purpose of service tax levy as held by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs Vs. Larsen and Toubro Limited - 2015 (39) STR 0913 (SC). 12 Accordingly, I hold that in spite of retrospective amendment in Rule 2 A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006, service tax cannot be charged for the services defined under Section 65(105)(zzzh).
Supreme Court of India Cites 70 - Cited by 249 - R F Nariman - Full Document
1