Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.04 seconds)

Luca Beltrami vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2020

"5. The learned Counsel for the petitioners pointed out a very serious anomaly insofar as the investigation and recording of the confession by the Investigating Officer herein, who is none other than the Forest Ranger who is not authorised under S.50(8) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 neither to investigate nor to record confession. The learned Counsel for the petitioner placed two decisions on this point. Luca Beltrami and Others v. State of Kerala reported in 2020 (4) KHC 603 is the final decision placed to substantiate the said point. Apart from that, he has placed decision of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Revision Application No.1 of 2015 rendered on 22/06/2015.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 4 - M Joseph - Full Document

Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2020

(ix) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].
Supreme Court of India Cites 74 - Cited by 15728 - M R Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next