Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.10 seconds)The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Upkar Singh vs Ved Prakash & Ors on 10 September, 2004
In this regard the learned
counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme
Court in Upkar Singh vs Ved Prakash and others, (2004) 13 SCC 292
and the judgments of this Court in the case of Govind Singh vs U. T. of
J&K, Manu/JK/07502/2021and Abdul Rashid vs. UT of J&K and
others, CRM(M) No. 238/2021, decided on 10.02.2023.
Section 156 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Babu Venkatesh vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 February, 2022
23. The Supreme Court in the case of Babu Venkatesh and others vs State
of Karnataka and anr reported in 2022 LiveLaw(SC) 181 has held that
prior to the filing of a petition under section 156 CrPC there have to be a
applications under section 154(1) and 154(3) of the Cr.P.C. and while
directing registration of FIR, the Magistrate has to consider these aspects
of the matter.
Mr. Robert John D'Souza & Ors vs Mr. Stephen V. Gomes & Anr on 21 July, 2015
30. The Supreme Court in Mr. Robert John D'Souza and others v V.
Gomes and another, (2015) 9 SCC 96 has observed that the Court must
ensure that the criminal prosecution is not used as an instrument of
harassment for seeking private vendetta or with an ulterior motive to
pressurize the accused.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M/S. Medchl Chemicals & Pharma P. Ltd vs M/S. Biological E. Ltd. & Ors. ... on 25 February, 2000
Similarly, in M/s Medchi Chemicals and
Pharma Pvt. Ltd. vs Biological E. Ltd and others reported in (2000) 3
SCC 269, the Supreme Court has observed that frustrated litigants ought
not to be allowed to indulge so as to give vent to their vindictiveness
through a legal process and such an investigation ought not to be allowed
to be continued since the same is opposed to concept of justice which is
paramount. Again in Mohan Goswami and anr. vs State of
Uttrakhanchal and others, (2007) 12 SCC 1, the Supreme Court has
laid down that the Court proceedings are not to be permitted to degenerate
into a weapon of harassment or persecution.