Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (0.26 seconds)
Smt. Sarita Vishnoi vs Gurjeet Singh S/O Sh. Manmohan Singh ... on 22 April, 2015 cites

Lalta Devi & Anr. vs Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors. on 12 January, 2015

Therefore, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors., I am of the view that in the absence of any evidence with regard to the good future prospects, the claimants are not entitled to any addition of 50% or 30% towards this. Thus, she is awarded an amount of Rs.10,51,315/­ (8,112/­ x 12 x 18 x 0.60) under the head Future Loss of Income.
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 578 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Reshma Kumari & Ors vs Madan Mohan & Anr on 2 April, 2013

40.In a recent judgment in HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors., (Decided on 12.1.2015), it was observed that in view of the observations of Hon'ble Apex Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. Vs. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 and further in the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India & Ors. Vs. S.K. Kapoor, (2011) 4 SCC 589, the three Judge Bench Decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (Supra) was held to be taken as a binding precedent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 2700 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Smt. Bishekha Devi & Anr. vs Mohd. Afsar & Ors. on 30 October, 2012

In MAC No.134/12, the respondent No.3/Insurance company is directed to pay the compensation of Rs.19,35,000/­ to the petitioner no.1 (mother of deceased Shubhneesh Vishnoi) and in MAC No.188/12, Rs. 37,72,187/­ to the petitioner Ms. Nikita Kumar within one month. Following the judgment of Smt. Bishekha Devi & Anr. Vs. Mohd. Afsar & Ors. MAC. APP. 1087/2012 passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court, the respondent no.3 shall also pay interest @ 9% p.a. on the total compensation amount from the date of petition till realization to the petitioners.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 303 - G P Mittal - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs S.K.Kapoor on 16 March, 2011

40.In a recent judgment in HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Lalta Devi & Ors., (Decided on 12.1.2015), it was observed that in view of the observations of Hon'ble Apex Court in Reshma Kumari & Ors. Vs. Madan Mohan & Anr., (2013) 9 SCC 65 and further in the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Union of India & Ors. Vs. S.K. Kapoor, (2011) 4 SCC 589, the three Judge Bench Decision in Reshma Kumari & Ors. (Supra) was held to be taken as a binding precedent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 532 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Kashmiri Lal And Ors. on 9 December, 2005

In case, even after MAC Petitions No.134/12 & 188/12 Page : 26/25 passage of 90 days from today, the Insurance Company fails to deposit this compensation with proportionate interest, in that event, in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Kashmiri Lal, 2007 ACJ 688, this compensation shall be recovered by attaching the bank account of the Insurance Company with a cost of Rs.10,000/­.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1437 - M Mudgal - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs Ashok Kumar & Anr on 24 January, 2014

23.Considering the settled law, this court can resort to some guess work when there is no definite evidence regarding earning of deceased or where deceased is a student. The capacity of deceased can be considered to arrive at just compensation. From the record, what emerges out is that deceased was pursuing B. Tech (EC) and was in his second year. Had he got a placement in some Private Sector, he would have earned good salary. He was also taking home tuitions and earning some amount. It is not practical to expect petitioners to provide documentary evidence in regard to the home tuitions. [Sanjay Kumar Vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr., 2014 ACJ 653 of Hon'ble Apex Court; Ramachandrappa Vs. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co., 2011 ACJ 2436 (SC)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 159 - V G Gowda - Full Document

Ramachandrappa vs Manager, Reliance General Insurance ... on 9 March, 2015

23.Considering the settled law, this court can resort to some guess work when there is no definite evidence regarding earning of deceased or where deceased is a student. The capacity of deceased can be considered to arrive at just compensation. From the record, what emerges out is that deceased was pursuing B. Tech (EC) and was in his second year. Had he got a placement in some Private Sector, he would have earned good salary. He was also taking home tuitions and earning some amount. It is not practical to expect petitioners to provide documentary evidence in regard to the home tuitions. [Sanjay Kumar Vs. Ashok Kumar & Anr., 2014 ACJ 653 of Hon'ble Apex Court; Ramachandrappa Vs. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co., 2011 ACJ 2436 (SC)].
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 425 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next