cites: 643956

A. K. Kraipak & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 April, 1969

"Since the decision of this Court in Kraipak's case (A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India) one golden rule that stands firmly established is that the doctrine of natural justice is not only to secure justice but to prevent miscarriage of justice. What, however, does this doctrine exactly mean?

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 1426 - Full Document

Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Girja Shankar Pant & Ors on 18 October, 2000

25. Further in Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Girja Shankar Pant, reported in (2001)1 SCC 182, the Supreme Court has held as under in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the reported judgment:

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 410 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

The Keshav Mills Company Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 8 December, 1972

As a matter of fact this Court in the case of Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India upon reliance on the attributes of the doctrine as above stated as below (SCC p.387,para

Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 113 - Full Document

Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977

26. It is now an accepted proposition of law that any statutory body which is entrusted by statute with discretion, must act fairly. It does not matter whether its functions are described as judicial or quasi-judicial on the one hand, or as administrative on the other. Even an administrative order, which involves civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice. Although the expression 'civil consequences' has not been defined anywhere, the observation made in Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, (1978) 1 SCC 405 at para-66 on page 440 is relevant in this context and reads as below:

Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 4221 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Southern Painters vs Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd on 10 September, 1993

8. Further, in Southern Painters Vs. Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore Ltd. and another reported in 1994 Supp.(2) SCC 699, the Supreme Court has held that :

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 133 - Full Document

Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 5 - Cited by 1058585

Section 80 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 7068

Malavkumar Arunbhai Patel vs Sardar Patel University And 2 Ors. on 3 November, 2006

In the case of Malavkumar Arunbhai Patel Vs. Sardar Patel University and others reported in 2006 (3) GLH 695, this Court, relying upon certain judgments of the Apex Court, has held as below :

Gujarat High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 16 - A Kumari - Full Document

The Right to Information Act, 2005

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 176415

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results