Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.32 seconds)Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune vs Sinhgad Technical Education Society on 16 October, 2015
7. As pointed earlier in the instant case proceedings u/s. 153C of the Act
have been initiated against the assessee on the basis of single incriminating
document seized from the premises of Ashoka Group i.e. an undated cheque
issued by assessee in favour of M/s. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. The Revenue has
failed to establish the assessment year to which it relates. In the absence of
any co-relation between the document seized and the assessment years under
appeal, the assessment already made cannot be disturbed under section
153C. There is a vacuum with respect to relevance of cheque seized from the
premises of searched party i.e. M/s. Ashoka Buildcon Ltd. and assessment
years under appeal. Thus, in the light of facts of the case and decision
rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sinhgad Technical
Education Society (supra.), no addition can be made in the impugned
assessment years on the basis of undated cheque.
Sinhagad Technical Education ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of ... on 6 January, 2017
No material has been placed on record to show that any incriminating
material was found in survey proceedings in the case of assessee and the
disclosure made by assessee is in any manner connected with the proceedings
arising u/s. 153C of the Act. It is a well settled law that where any
9
ITA Nos. 2111 to 2114/PUN/2014,
A.Ys. 2007-08 to 2010-11
incriminating material is not found in the course of search relating to any
assessment years in respect of third party, the assessments for such
assessment years in respect of third party cannot be disturbed. The Co-
ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Sinhgad Technical Education
Society Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) has held that where
no assessment year specific incriminating material or document is found,
assessments of such assessment year cannot be disturbed by invoking the
provisions of section 153C of the Act. In the absence of any reference to any
assessment year specific incriminating information or document relatable to
assessee for the assessment year in question in the reasons recorded by
Assessing Officer, impugned assessment u/s. 153C is bad in law. The relevant
extract of the order of Tribunal read as under :
Section 133A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Finance Act, 2015
Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & ... on 14 August, 2014
ITA Nos. 2111 to 2114/PUN/2014,
A.Ys. 2007-08 to 2010-11
The aforesaid decision of Pune Bench of the Tribunal has been upheld
by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
(supra).
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Mechmen 11-C on 10 July, 2015
In support of his submissions the ld. AR placed reliance on the
decision of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner
of Income Tax Vs. Mechmen reported as 380 ITR 591.
M/S. New Delhi Television Ltd., New ... vs Dcit, New Delhi on 14 July, 2017
Ltd Vs. ACIT (supra.) while explaining difference between the expressions
'belongs to', 'relates to' or 'refers to' has held:
Canyon Financial Services Ltd vs Income Tax Officer on 10 July, 2017
The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Canyon Financial Services
Ltd. Vs. ITO reported as 249 Taxman 493 has again explained the difference
between the expressions 'belong to' and 'pertain to'. The Hon'ble High Court
held :