Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)
M/S. Shivnath Automobile Pvt.Ltd vs Dinesh Chauhan & Anr. on 30 May, 2016 cites

Bhagwat vs Branch Manager, United India Insurance ... on 27 February, 2015

In Bhagwat vs. The United India Insurance Company Limited, IV (2014) CPJ 698 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission has observed that petitioner never applied before Regional Transport Officer for getting permanent registration of the vehicle and for failure to meet // 19 // statutory requirement regarding registration of the vehicle, the complainant was not entitled to get claim even on non-standard basis.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Niteen Kumar Mittal on 30 March, 2016

11. The duty cast upon the complainant / owner to submit application for registration before the Registering Authority within seven days from the date of taking delivery of the vehicle along with Sale Certificate and valid insurance certificate, but in the instant case, the complainant did not obtain Certificate of Registration. Shri P.K. Paul, has further argued that that the insurance policy was issued in favour of the complainant for unregistered vehicle on the basis of engine number and chassis number of the vehicle. The vehicle in question was being used by the complainant without Certificate of Registration, which is violation of provisions of Section 39 and 43 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, therefore, the O.P.No.2 has repudiated the claim of the complainant. On the basis of Survey Report, the Insurance Company came to the conclusion that on 08.02.2014 the vehicle in question was not registered with the R.T.O. and the complainant was using the vehicle without obtaining Certificate of Registration, which is violation of provisions of Section 39 and 43 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, therefore, the Insurance Company has rightly repudiated the claim of the complainant and by doing so, it has not committed any deficiency in service or unfair trade practice. The impugned order passed by the District Forum, is erroneous, and is liable to be set aside. He placed reliance on The New India Assurance Company Limited, Through Its Manager, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (C.G.) Vs. Shri Preetam Soni and another, Appeal // 11 // No.FA/2015/441 decided by this Commission on 28.12.2015 and Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Shri Nitin Kumar Mittal - Appeal No.FA/2015/232 decided by this Commission on 30.03.2016.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 12 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next