Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.37 seconds)
Mruthunjaya vs ) Universal Sampo General on 16 June, 2015 cites

G.Ravindranath @ R.Chowdary vs E.Srinivas & Anr on 1 July, 2013

40. The counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision reported in 2013 ACJ 2131 (G.Ravindranath Vs E.Srinivas and another. In the said case also, the victim had suffered fracture and grievous injuries in pelvic region and total rupture of urethra resulting in impotence and the injured was suffering from severe pain and was not passing urine through normal course, requiring catheterization and suffered erectile dysfunction. In the said case, the Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.2,10,000/-, which was enhanced to Rs.4,35,000/- by the High Court and the Apex Court had finally awarded in all Rs.20,20,000/-. I have gone through and taken into consideration the principles laiddown in the said judgment while awarding compensation in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 80 - Full Document

M.C.D vs Asscn.,Victims Of Uphaar Tragedy & Ors on 13 October, 2011

In a case reported in (2011) 4 SCC 481 : (AIR 2012 SC 100) (Municipal Council of Delhi Vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy), the Supreme Court has held that the Court has to take into account the rate of interest of the nationalized bank and the present day cost of living and thereby awarded, interest on the compensation amount at 9% p.a. I have no reasons to deviate from the said view of the Apex Court. Accordingly, interest on compensation amount is awarded at 9% p.a. Accordingly, issue No.3 is answered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1848 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1