Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.40 seconds)The Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906
Section 2 in The Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 [Entire Act]
Gajanan Narayan Patil And Ors vs Dattatraya Waman Patil And Ors on 20 February, 1990
This decision was
followed in the cases of (1) Narayan S/o Bhagwan Bholankar and
::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2019 04:06:15 :::
6
wp387.8235.17.odt
others v. Dattatraya S/o Digambar Tayade and others [Writ Petition
No.4609 of 2015 decided on 28-4-2016]; (2) Ramesh Damu Patil v.
Purushottam Umrao Chavan and others, reported in
2017(1) Mh.L.J. 818; (3) Vilas Gajanan Bhujbal and others v. Pushpa
Chandrakant Dabhade and others, reported in 2018(2) Mh.L.J. 322;
and (4) Bachulal @ Narayandas s/o Rambilas Rathi and another v.
Mohan Bhagwatrao Thakare and ors., reported in
2016 Mh.L.J. Online 52. In all these decisions, it is held that the
Collector was not competent under sub-section (2A) of Section 23 of
the said Act to delegate the powers of deciding the revision under
sub-section (2) of Section 23 therein to the Sub-Divisional Officer and
accordingly the decision was set aside.
Section 5 in The Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 [Entire Act]
Shri. Vilas Gajanan Bhujbal And Ors vs Sou. Pushpa Chandrakant Dabhade And Ors on 11 December, 2017
This decision was
followed in the cases of (1) Narayan S/o Bhagwan Bholankar and
::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 01/08/2019 04:06:15 :::
6
wp387.8235.17.odt
others v. Dattatraya S/o Digambar Tayade and others [Writ Petition
No.4609 of 2015 decided on 28-4-2016]; (2) Ramesh Damu Patil v.
Purushottam Umrao Chavan and others, reported in
2017(1) Mh.L.J. 818; (3) Vilas Gajanan Bhujbal and others v. Pushpa
Chandrakant Dabhade and others, reported in 2018(2) Mh.L.J. 322;
and (4) Bachulal @ Narayandas s/o Rambilas Rathi and another v.
Mohan Bhagwatrao Thakare and ors., reported in
2016 Mh.L.J. Online 52. In all these decisions, it is held that the
Collector was not competent under sub-section (2A) of Section 23 of
the said Act to delegate the powers of deciding the revision under
sub-section (2) of Section 23 therein to the Sub-Divisional Officer and
accordingly the decision was set aside.