Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.33 seconds)

Sukhdev Ram Jaidka vs Amarjeet Singh Dullot And Another on 22 March, 2013

If the petitioner no. 6 is of the opinion that it would be better in life to start a business from the tenanted premises, then it would not be just for this Court to direct the petitioner otherwise and thereby stop the financial growth of the family of the petitioner. The Court cannot ask the son of the petitioner to give up his dreams of excelling in life and to establish his own business from a E. No. 60/2013 Sukhdev Singh Vs Amarjeet Singh Page no. 11 of 15 premises owned by his family. Though the success of the business to be established by the son of the petitioner is not guaranteed, but, at the same time the Court cannot predict the failure of the same and thereby decline the petitioner and his family an opportunity to establish their own business from a premises owned by them. This also draws support from the submission that the petitioner no. 1 was unable to find a suitable match for his petitioner no. 5 and 6 who are of marriageable age, due to lack of petitioner no. 6's employment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - R Bindal - Full Document

Joginder Pal vs Naval Kishore Behal on 10 May, 2002

AIR 2002 SC 2256 (as referred to in aforesaid judgment) the situation was similar to the present case, as in the said case before the Apex Court the landlord had filed eviction petition for the office of his son who was a chartered accountant who was residing with him. Honorable Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti observed in the said judgment that such a requirement of the landlord is a genuine requirement. In the said case the Apex Court evicted the tenant from the premises for the said requirement of the landlord.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 399 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Mohinder Prasad Jain vs Manohar Lal Jain on 24 February, 2006

eviction petition even without impleading other co-owners. Reliance is placed on judgments Kanta Udharam Jagasia Vs C.K.S Rao: (1998)1 SCC 403; Surender Kumar Jhamb Vs Om Prakash Shokeen: 2000(2) RCR 540; Mohinder Prasad Jain Vs Manohar Lal Jain: (2006) 2 SCC 724; India Umbrella Manufacturing Co Vs Bhagadandei Aggarwal: (2004) 3 SCC 178; Sri Ram Pasricha Vs Jagannath: (1976)4 SCC 184.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 170 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Sriram Pasricha vs Jagannath & Ors on 24 August, 1976

eviction petition even without impleading other co-owners. Reliance is placed on judgments Kanta Udharam Jagasia Vs C.K.S Rao: (1998)1 SCC 403; Surender Kumar Jhamb Vs Om Prakash Shokeen: 2000(2) RCR 540; Mohinder Prasad Jain Vs Manohar Lal Jain: (2006) 2 SCC 724; India Umbrella Manufacturing Co Vs Bhagadandei Aggarwal: (2004) 3 SCC 178; Sri Ram Pasricha Vs Jagannath: (1976)4 SCC 184.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 439 - P K Goswami - Full Document
1   2 Next