cites: 6581408

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Windlas Jewellers, Ambala, Haryana vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Ambala, ... on 1 April, 2024 cites

Messrs Mehta Parikh & Co vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay on 10 May, 1956

11.3 Further, reference was drawn to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme court in case of Mehta Parikh and Company vs. CIT (1956) 30 ITR 181 (SC) wherein it was held as under:

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 335 - N H Bhagwati - Full Document

M/S K.Y. Sanitation vs Commissioner Of Vat Bikri Kar Bhawan And ... on 4 March, 2020

i i. Ba nk A/ c s ta te ments fo r A. Y 2 017 - 18 iii. Q uanti ty wi se tra di ng A/ c fo r A.Y 20 17- 1 8 ITA No.821/CHANDI/2023 Assessment Year : 2017-18 WindlasJewellers, Ambala, Haryana Page 5 of 14 iv. VAT re tur ns f or A. Y 2 017 - 18 v. VAT a sse ssme nt o r der fo r F.Y 20 16- 1 7 vi. Bil ls no. wise d etai ls o f ca sh sa les

Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - C H Shankar - Full Document

U.I.T. Udaipur vs Viraf.S.Go-Ju University Udaipur on 27 June, 2022

i) ACI T vs. Go el Jewell ers Ov ersea s Co rp in I TA No .15 97 /Del /2 022 (I TAT Delhi) ITA No.821/CHANDI/2023 Assessment Year : 2017-18 WindlasJewellers, Ambala, Haryana Page 8 of 14 i i) D CI T Centr al Cir cle -1 , Lud hia na vs. M / s Ro o p Fashi on r epo r ted i n [ 202 2] 98 I TR ( Tr ib ) 4 19 [I TAT Cha nd) ] i ii ) Gulshan Kuma r vs. DCI T in I TA No. 488 /Chd/ 20 22 (I TAT Chandig a rh) i v) Smt. Tri pta Ra ni vs. ACI T, Lud hia na in I TA No .13 5/ Chd /2 0 21 (I TAT Cha nd i g ar h)

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - R Vyas - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Messrs Mehta Parikh & Co vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay on 10 May, 1956

M/S K.Y. Sanitation vs Commissioner Of Vat Bikri Kar Bhawan And ... on 4 March, 2020

U.I.T. Udaipur vs Viraf.S.Go-Ju University Udaipur on 27 June, 2022