Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.30 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 83 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 86 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 123 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Representation of the People Act, 1951
Section 87 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Ram Sukh vs Dinesh Aggarwal on 18 September, 2009
In a recent decision on which reliance is placed by
Mr.Kumbhakoni and reported in A.I.R. 2010 S.C. 1227 (Ram Sukh Vs.
Dinesh Aggarwal) this is what the Supreme Court has observed:-
Harmohinder Singh Pradhan vs Ranjeet Singh Talwandi & Ors on 28 April, 2005
33] Analysing the provision and the pleadings necessary for the said
corrupt practice to be ultimately held as proved, this is what the Supreme
Court has held in the case of Harmohinder Singh Pradan Vs. Ranjeet
Singh Talwandi (AIR 2005 SC 2379):
Udhav Singh vs Madhav Rao Scindia on 10 October, 1975
Referring to earlier
pronouncements of this Court in Samant N. Balkrishna (AIR
1969 SC 1201) (supra) and Udhav Singh Vs. Madhav Rao
Scindia wherein it was observed that the omission of a single
material fact would lead to incomplete cause of action and
that an election petition without the material facts is not an
election petition at all, the Bench held that all the facts which
are essential to clothe the petition with complete cause of
action must be pleaded and omission of even a single
material fact would amount to disobedience of the mandate
of Section 83(1)(a) of the Act and an election petition can be
and must be dismissed if it suffers from any such vice."