Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (3.03 seconds)Section 19 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 15 in Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 17 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Smt Mahadevamma vs Guruswamy B M on 17 November, 2017
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a
judgment in W.P.No.84101/2012, where a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court was considering an election petition
where only those candidates who had filed their
nominations for the 'Backward 'A' Woman' reserved
category were arrayed as parties. This Court held that
when the result of any or all the candidates is sought to be
declared as void, then all the candidates need to be
arrayed as respondents in an election petition. The learned
counsel for the respondent Nos.4 to 6 relied upon a
judgment of this Court in the case of
8
SMT.MAHADEVAMMA VS. M.R.GURUSWAMY AND
OTHERS reported in LAWS(KAR)-2016-10-19 and
MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA VS. PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF,
HUBLI AND OTHERS reported in 1995 SCC ONLINE
KAR 23, where Co-ordinate Benches of this Court held
that a reading of Section 15(2)(a) of the Act, 1993 is
mandatory and has to be complied with.
Mallikarjunagouda vs Principal Munsiff on 12 July, 1995
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a
judgment in W.P.No.84101/2012, where a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court was considering an election petition
where only those candidates who had filed their
nominations for the 'Backward 'A' Woman' reserved
category were arrayed as parties. This Court held that
when the result of any or all the candidates is sought to be
declared as void, then all the candidates need to be
arrayed as respondents in an election petition. The learned
counsel for the respondent Nos.4 to 6 relied upon a
judgment of this Court in the case of
8
SMT.MAHADEVAMMA VS. M.R.GURUSWAMY AND
OTHERS reported in LAWS(KAR)-2016-10-19 and
MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA VS. PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF,
HUBLI AND OTHERS reported in 1995 SCC ONLINE
KAR 23, where Co-ordinate Benches of this Court held
that a reading of Section 15(2)(a) of the Act, 1993 is
mandatory and has to be complied with.
Sri H Mohankumar vs The Chief Election Commissioner on 21 March, 2017
The learned
Additional Government Advocate on the other hand relied
on a judgment of this Court in H.MOHANKUMAR VS. THE
CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER in
W.P.NO.53617/2016.
1